It's collab count too? Just asking.
Collab diffs count equally for all people involved as [1] - so if three people collab a diff, one of which is the owner of the set, the owner gets +1 ranked set and the other two get +1 GD. It made more sense to me than having people with fractions of diffs which could get confusing later on.SYAHME wrote: 533p56
It's collab count too? Just asking.
soon(tm)Sinnoh wrote: 2f4r3l
tfw qualified doesn't count
was referring to the fact that soon it will (hopefully) be ranked. I don't intend to start listing qualified maps here, as you say it's too much effort xdAscendance wrote: 521c6g
probably better to not include qualified considering things can be dq'd and sometimes left in grave forevermuch less work to only include ranked maps
Aiming for april charts winner, 2nd place, and 3rd placeJBHyperion wrote: 41h4c
Congrats to Ponchiwi and Roseus for their first ranked maps! Hope to see many more maps from you both in the future!
In other news, would anyone else like to get a map qualified this month, or should we just leave it all to Ascendance :thinking:
Bruh, i'm trying to push another map so im not stopping my hyped train for ranking maps now ive gotten startedJBHyperion wrote: 41h4c
Congrats to Ponchiwi and Roseus for their first ranked maps! Hope to see many more maps from you both in the future!
In other news, would anyone else like to get a map qualified this month, or should we just leave it all to Ascendance :thinking:
JBHyperion wrote: 41h4c
I don't rank bad mapsets. I make them.
Should discuss that over a "GY-Maps(/Badly rated by in-topic comments) ranking" thread.alienflybot wrote: 6z6c1q
hilel dont argue
im the one who make crappy maps :^)
dab dab dabJBHyperion wrote: 41h4c
People visiting from ascendance's "social experiment" and thinking this is the same thing :zzz:
People are listed here because they are currently or have previously contributed to the osu!catch mapping community in the past - whether those contributions were significant or slight doesn't matter. All information here is 100% objective and could be found by any sufficiently motivated individual, so I see no reason to remove people. Besides, this actually draws more attention to them by virtue of their absence
For the record: this thread is purely for statistical purposes - the back/forth between myself, afb and others was obviously sarcastic and should not be taken remotely seriously.