Spec and CLSW would be this entire list ayy lmaoalienflybot wrote: 6z6c1q
imo make a top star rating of the maps ranking?
dem I am gonna lose itJBHyperion wrote: 41h4c
12. alienflybot - 3 / 0 / 10
- Most ranked diffs with no ranked GDs
yup, gratzalienflybot wrote: 6z6c1q
dem I am gonna lose itJBHyperion wrote: 41h4c
12. alienflybot - 3 / 0 / 10
- Most ranked diffs with no ranked GDs
I noticed this quite long ago but I dont know name of the mapperZHSteven wrote: g5y5v
IOSYS - Taihen na Mono no Shoushitsu(Kana's ctb)
I think you probably forgot this...
btw I dont know why it is not shown on search engine...
you will noticed that there is a first CTB mapping contest if you read the thread lol
Good catch (pun intended), thank you!ZHSteven wrote: g5y5v
IOSYS - Taihen na Mono no Shoushitsu(Kana's ctb)
I think you probably forgot this...
btw I dont know why it is not shown on search engine...
you will noticed that there is a first CTB mapping contest if you read the thread lol
I'm not sure who this is directed to, but it's neither appropriate or necessary. This thread exists for statistical and informational purposes only. If you want to air your grievances on a particular mapper or the perceived poor state of CtB mapping in general, I ask you to do so elsewhere so that this thread can remain clean.Krzysiek wrote: 4j5r53
Seeing top mappers it's no wonder recent mapping lacks diversity and beauty.
Can not guarantee that it contains every ranked CtB map given the aforementioned "bug", but this is probably the closest we have at the moment: t/330552Krzysiek wrote: 4j5r53
ZHSteven makes a good point regarding non-searchable CtB entries. Does this community have anyone with access to all ranked/approved maps?
Hmm, I disagree with both of these, 1 because of the fact multiple people could do this (Of course, Xinely's was good, and most people couldn't make it as good as hers, but it's still possible), and 2 because that's not really an achievement.BoberOfDarkness wrote: 41384u
Xinely don't have any special comment to her maps but I found some which could be added:
1. Team "Hanayamata" - Yorokobi Synchronicity this was the first map which was unranked after ing the qualified section
more to come
*runs
This is incorrect now, the cup for this is 0.87*.JBHyperion wrote: 41h4c
[list][*]Easiest ranked CtB difficulty by Star Rating - UNDEAD CORPORATION - Setsugetsu Ouka no Kuni {Cup, 0.94*}
Thanks for reminding me, you sure do push the boundaries (^:- Magic Bomb - wrote: 315l1i
This is incorrect now, the cup for this is 0.87*.JBHyperion wrote: 41h4c
[list][*]Easiest ranked CtB difficulty by Star Rating - UNDEAD CORPORATION - Setsugetsu Ouka no Kuni {Cup, 0.94*}
Thanks for the reminder, I'll change that now \:D/BoberOfDarkness wrote: 41384u
Thanks to t e l e p a t h Telepathy Nouryokusha - Mugen TEARDROPS Namida no Umi de you can change the calmest and easiest difficulty titles![]()
Collab diffs count equally for all people involved as [1] - so if three people collab a diff, one of which is the owner of the set, the owner gets +1 ranked set and the other two get +1 GD. It made more sense to me than having people with fractions of diffs which could get confusing later on.SYAHME wrote: 533p56
It's collab count too? Just asking.
soon(tm)Sinnoh wrote: 2f4r3l
tfw qualified doesn't count
was referring to the fact that soon it will (hopefully) be ranked. I don't intend to start listing qualified maps here, as you say it's too much effort xdAscendance wrote: 521c6g
probably better to not include qualified considering things can be dq'd and sometimes left in grave forevermuch less work to only include ranked maps
Aiming for april charts winner, 2nd place, and 3rd placeJBHyperion wrote: 41h4c
Congrats to Ponchiwi and Roseus for their first ranked maps! Hope to see many more maps from you both in the future!
In other news, would anyone else like to get a map qualified this month, or should we just leave it all to Ascendance :thinking:
Bruh, i'm trying to push another map so im not stopping my hyped train for ranking maps now ive gotten startedJBHyperion wrote: 41h4c
Congrats to Ponchiwi and Roseus for their first ranked maps! Hope to see many more maps from you both in the future!
In other news, would anyone else like to get a map qualified this month, or should we just leave it all to Ascendance :thinking:
JBHyperion wrote: 41h4c
I don't rank bad mapsets. I make them.
Should discuss that over a "GY-Maps(/Badly rated by in-topic comments) ranking" thread.alienflybot wrote: 6z6c1q
hilel dont argue
im the one who make crappy maps :^)
dab dab dabJBHyperion wrote: 41h4c
People visiting from ascendance's "social experiment" and thinking this is the same thing :zzz:
People are listed here because they are currently or have previously contributed to the osu!catch mapping community in the past - whether those contributions were significant or slight doesn't matter. All information here is 100% objective and could be found by any sufficiently motivated individual, so I see no reason to remove people. Besides, this actually draws more attention to them by virtue of their absence
For the record: this thread is purely for statistical purposes - the back/forth between myself, afb and others was obviously sarcastic and should not be taken remotely seriously.