Sign In To Proceed i2v15

Don't have an ? 1a2w41

osu! to create your own !
forum

[osu!] Silentroom - Nhelv by pw384 3h1m1y

posted
Total Posts
16

Should Silentroom - Nhelv be Loved? d4e5i

Yes
331
96.78%
No
11
3.22%
Total votes: 342
Polling ended
Topic Starter
Main thread: pw384
174.59 BPM, 2:37 | 195.35★
The [Distortion fix (no autofail debug)] difficulty is not being nominated for Loved.

Captain's description (by BATBALL):
(Do you know what I love more than gimmicks? Puzzles, I really love Puzzles!)

This month's Gameplay Gimmicks pick is special. And— well, it's more than just a gimmick map... I'll be honest. It's more than just a map for that matter...

pw384 really is a "Visioneer" of technical mapping.

Uh— if you wanna know a fun fact... well, this map is physically FC-able, so good luck to all you aspire-grinders (🔥). I'm excited to see your scores... #aspire-grinders

Anyways, um— Voting "ZFT" for this map in April's Loved polls is key to making sure this map ends up in the Loved category. So be sure to do so...

..--- ----- ..--- .....

Please use this thread to discuss why you believe this map should or should not enter the Loved category!
today is a good day
we eating good
yes please
nice
the world is healing
he best Aspire map, one of the most accomplished. So clearly yes, it deserves to be loved!!!
WHAT
PLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLZ LoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoVED
500* map too easy

A random guy wrote: 2l5p5b

IF THIS GETS LOVED SOLACE OF OBLIVION WILL BE DETHRONED!
If this gets loved aspire will come back in 2025
this is what we wanted to see in aspire v
innovation! (xnor was cool tho)

if this was part of an aspire contest, it would probably win
I wouldn't be surprised if there isn't a single "NO" for this beatmap until Loved (as of the time of this post, there have been 301 "Yes" but not a single "No").
OFC THIS SHOULD BE LOVED

CLICKMACHINE wrote: 2n1et

500* map too easy
easy top pp score
Topic Starter
This map ed the voting! It will be moved to Loved soon.
Please sign in to reply.

New reply 18684e