Your highness

Can we behead all of the people listed above?

I'm sorry, I can't attend my jury duty, I hate the parrots and people in santa hats. I don't believe I can maintain objectivity

Will you guys stand for this?

But i wanted to be that dumb degenerate jury that some courtroom have

abraker wrote: 6w3t1z

Will you guys stand for this?

I like banning people.

ColdTooth wrote: 3g2f1d

abraker wrote: 6w3t1z

Will you guys stand for this?

I like banning people.

Hmmmmm 🤔💭

I will volunteer to be the defendant's attorney.

Defendant's attorney position is now filled in. Judge is still open even though it has Aiseca on there

ok

Westonini wrote: 721h6q

play danganronpa trial music while the court is in session

Yasssssssss...

Also I want to be the Prosecutor.

P/s: this will do as well.

done. Two (three) more positions left: Judge, Clerk, and Reporter

i can be the reporter

Since I can't be part of the jury because I'm racist, I could be the bailiff. I have plenty of experience in public safety.

Penguin wrote: 2l1d1p

Since I can't be part of the jury because I'm racist, I could be the bailiff. I have plenty of experience in public safety.

Owh~~ it's a legit one...

do we really need a bailiff?

For liability purposes, yes.

well then . . .

woops missed rince, reporter position is now filled
sorry about that

So who's the Sheriff?

Meah wrote: 372j3t

So who's the Sheriff?

Isn't that the bailiff they were talking about?

Westonini wrote: 721h6q

Meah wrote: 372j3t

So who's the Sheriff?

Isn't that the bailiff they were talking about?

O shit sorry, didn't back read

It would be cool as heck if we do this on Ace Attorney online.

If I correctly, there's even a sprite for a parrot character.

tad01123 wrote: 3e576u

It would be cool as heck if we do this on Ace Attorney online.

If I correctly, there's even a sprite for a parrot character.

I second this

I've got no idea about that game.

That looks cool. I'll need to look into whether I can run my own server, otherwise not sure how that will work.

B1rd wrote: 144h19

I've got no idea about that game.

Same.

Before I put significant effort in organizing the event and getting the thing to work, I need to be sure everyone is fine with the event taking place at a certain time. I can almost guarantee that either most of you don't want to or timing won't work out, but surprise me if you can.

hmm.

the event seems cool i suppose, 5 PM - 9 PM PST would be optimal in my case.

Rather than doing an "event", it may simply be more expedient to have the court in a thread. That would allow everyone plenty of time and follow along with the spirit of the forum.

that'd be fair.

i think i'd prefer the idea of a forum thread dedicated to it, but i don't believe i'd have many complaints either way.

@b1rd yea that's what will prob end up happening, but I still want to see how many are willing to do an "event"

I'm down for a thread, not an event.

I'd be down for an event, but I guarantee you it's near impossible to schedule it with the number of people all around the world taking part in this.

A thread is def the safer bet

I'm voting for a thread instead.

A thread would be fine.


Also, let’s just skip a clerk. Would be too much traffic and the person posting the thread would act as one

Alright court day will be a few days from now. Keep on the lookout for a thread!

You should pm everyone involved. I don't check often enough to notice if it's up or not.

I can check from time to time, I am creeping most of the time here~~

can we get a forum mod to enforce the ruling

Vuelo Eluko wrote: 2w5r5p

can we get a forum mod to enforce the ruling

We can think of that later on the road..

fantastic

abraker wrote: 6w3t1z

lucrative

I don't think you understand what this word means.

Oh I do

this makes my life much easier. Do you know how hard it would have been to deal with b1rd?
also *sniff sniff* you smell that? it's hint of sarcasm

What gives you the right to unilaterally kick me off the case? I've already done the groundwork, and you had already confirmed me.

B1rd wrote: 144h19

What gives you the right to unilaterally kick me off the case? I've already done the groundwork, and you had already confirmed me.

Apparently your client :\

He's a fool to dispense of my services.

I agree since makes it easier for me lol

I thought you were insulting me since you said you were being sarcastic.

mfw trying to work out what abraker is saying.

no, I was not referring to you at all when I said that. It was a sarcastic usage of "Despite".
The reply was directed to john in justification of the word "lucrative"