Meah is cuter tho
forum
The Church of Suisei Hoshimachi 625j13
posted
Total Posts
235
That stuttering is very very weird when it's done in english, indeed.Winnyace wrote: q371l
Penguin wrote: 2l1d1p
"Parasocial relationships are one-sided relationships, where one person extends emotional energy, interest and time, and the other party, the persona, is completely unaware of the other's existence."
sh-she's real shut up.
I agree.Penguin wrote: 2l1d1p
A lot of religious people I've spoken to and have seen talk tend to have the belief that people can't have morals without "god." I completely disagree. Secular morality is a very interesting subject to study that type of stuff.
Also, religious morality is completely subjective since there are numerous amounts or religions that all have contradicting moral beliefs. The same is true with cultures all around the world. Morals are extremely subjective, so why should one religion's morals out rule the others? From my experience, religious people tend to see the world and their "rules" as black and white, when it very well isn't.
I've had a belief for a while that religion can be good for the individual, but is very likely to become corrupt and toxic as a whole. Here in America religion and politics are so intertwined with each other, which has created a very toxic and unstable environment.
That's why, even though I like and some religion, I will never be religious myself.
I don't believe you have to be religious to be a good person, nor to have a sense of fulfillment in your life.
It can provides both, but religion can also rob people of both given the situation.
100% agreeTad Fibonacci wrote: 5m2r4d
I agree.Penguin wrote: 2l1d1p
A lot of religious people I've spoken to and have seen talk tend to have the belief that people can't have morals without "god." I completely disagree. Secular morality is a very interesting subject to study that type of stuff.
Also, religious morality is completely subjective since there are numerous amounts or religions that all have contradicting moral beliefs. The same is true with cultures all around the world. Morals are extremely subjective, so why should one religion's morals out rule the others? From my experience, religious people tend to see the world and their "rules" as black and white, when it very well isn't.
I've had a belief for a while that religion can be good for the individual, but is very likely to become corrupt and toxic as a whole. Here in America religion and politics are so intertwined with each other, which has created a very toxic and unstable environment.
That's why, even though I like and some religion, I will never be religious myself.
I don't believe you have to be religious to be a good person, nor to have a sense of fulfillment in your life.
It can provides both, but religion can also rob people of both given the situation.
nice talk
Penguin wrote: 2l1d1p
A lot of religious people I've spoken to and have seen talk tend to have the belief that people can't have morals without "god." I completely disagree. Secular morality is a very interesting subject to study that type of stuff.Tad Fibonacci wrote: 5m2r4d
Even though Christianity is important in the development of civilization, it is not without flaws.
It teaches people to be "good", act "good" and you'll go to heaven when you die. Act "bad" and you'll go to hell.
It downplays the importance of life with promises of a better afterlife.
Why make the best of what you have and strive, when you can just act good but live a boring and stagnant life with little to no meaning or achievements. You'll get to be in Heaven when you die anyways.
Also, religious morality is completely subjective since there are numerous amounts or religions that all have contradicting moral beliefs. The same is true with cultures all around the world. Morals are extremely subjective, so why should one religion's morals out rule the others? From my experience, religious people tend to see the world and their "rules" as black and white, when it very well isn't.
I've had a belief for a while that religion can be good for the individual, but is very likely to become corrupt and toxic as a whole. Here in America religion and politics are so intertwined with each other, which has created a very toxic and unstable environment.
You are both very right, but something you have to keep in mind is that religion can be used, and has been used as means of applying rules and good morals. It is true that without religion the world could perhaps be a better place, as religion is currently being used as a means of profiting instead of applying law and morals. Law would've of-course formed without the creation of religions, and people would've most likely found a way to profit off of laws.
The toxicity of religion stems from the selfishness of an individual, basically when someone wants to profit money from religion, they accept donations, and this can also be used to profit not only in currency but in anything else. In the past the pope used to crown the prince and choose who holds power and who doesn't, of-course the pope used to hold power to certain degree too. Slowly the power of religion declined as people stopped being ignorant and easily manipulated.
I say in the future the world will see a massive decline in church usage and religion as a whole will decrease in popularity. Though countries that people can still be manipulated in can still be found, the most popular Mafia/militia~ thing in my country is literally called The People of God (or the followers of God).
As long as people don't acquire all their needs, they will cling to someone or something to provide for them comfort. A coping mechanism, called religion.
Nah man, we don't want her to sing happy birthday to herself like curiosity rover did.Winnyace wrote: q371l
let's talk to NASA to put her on a spaceship.Tad Fibonacci wrote: 5m2r4d
I believe she's already went to space.q9za wrote: 2a2r19
Sui-chan can into space, no spacesuit.
To a Next Color Planet.
okq9za wrote: 2a2r19
Penguin wrote: 2l1d1p
A lot of religious people I've spoken to and have seen talk tend to have the belief that people can't have morals without "god." I completely disagree. Secular morality is a very interesting subject to study that type of stuff.Tad Fibonacci wrote: 5m2r4d
Even though Christianity is important in the development of civilization, it is not without flaws.
It teaches people to be "good", act "good" and you'll go to heaven when you die. Act "bad" and you'll go to hell.
It downplays the importance of life with promises of a better afterlife.
Why make the best of what you have and strive, when you can just act good but live a boring and stagnant life with little to no meaning or achievements. You'll get to be in Heaven when you die anyways.
Also, religious morality is completely subjective since there are numerous amounts or religions that all have contradicting moral beliefs. The same is true with cultures all around the world. Morals are extremely subjective, so why should one religion's morals out rule the others? From my experience, religious people tend to see the world and their "rules" as black and white, when it very well isn't.
I've had a belief for a while that religion can be good for the individual, but is very likely to become corrupt and toxic as a whole. Here in America religion and politics are so intertwined with each other, which has created a very toxic and unstable environment.
You are both very right, but something you have to keep in mind is that religion can be used, and has been used as means of applying rules and good morals. It is true that without religion the world could perhaps be a better place, as religion is currently being used as a means of profiting instead of applying law and morals. Law would've of-course formed without the creation of religions, and people would've most likely found a way to profit off of laws.
The toxicity of religion stems from the selfishness of an individual, basically when someone wants to profit money from religion, they accept donations, and this can also be used to profit not only in currency but in anything else. In the past the pope used to crown the prince and choose who holds power and who doesn't, of-course the pope used to hold power to certain degree too. Slowly the power of religion declined as people stopped being ignorant and easily manipulated.
I say in the future the world will see a massive decline in church usage and religion as a whole will decrease in popularity. Though countries that people can still be manipulated in can still be found, the most popular Mafia/militia~ thing in my country is literally called The People of God (or the followers of God).
As long as people don't acquire all their needs, they will cling to someone or something to provide for them comfort. A coping mechanism, called religion.
thisq9za wrote: 2a2r19
The one where they talk about virtual women?
ITS SCARLET ROSE AVATAReblf2013 wrote: 6m2565
Dorime is a great religion.Ashton wrote: 5q2y11
What are some of the religious beliefs this church holds?
I’m trying to find a religion to and I’m deciding between dorime and this church. Perhaps I’ll start my own religion if none of them can persuade me.
*scarlet rose plays in background*MinNin wrote: 6l4q56
ITS SCARLET ROSE AVATAReblf2013 wrote: 6m2565
Dorime is a great religion.Ashton wrote: 5q2y11
What are some of the religious beliefs this church holds?
I’m trying to find a religion to and I’m deciding between dorime and this church. Perhaps I’ll start my own religion if none of them can persuade me.
eriri is the super-definitely-not-multi mapper of beatmapsets/780372 !